QA vs QE featured

Quality Assurance vs Quality Engineering (QA vs QE)

Two terms that often surface in discussions about software quality are Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Engineering (QE). While these terms might seem interchangeable, they represent distinct philosophies and methodologies in the pursuit of software excellence.

This article aims to demystify the concepts of QA vs QE, highlighting their differences, similarities, and how they complement each other in modern software development. Whether you’re a software professional, a business leader, or simply curious about quality practices, this guide will help you understand these critical aspects of software development in simple, accessible terms.

On This Page

Understanding Quality Assurance (QA)

What is Quality Assurance?

Quality Assurance (QA) refers to the systematic processes and activities designed to ensure that a product or service meets specified quality standards. In software development, QA focuses on preventing defects by establishing and maintaining proper processes and standards throughout the development lifecycle.

QA is often described as a process-oriented approach that emphasizes adherence to predefined standards and procedures. It operates on the principle that by following the right processes, quality outcomes will naturally follow.

Key Activities in QA

QA encompasses various activities aimed at maintaining quality standards:

  • Process Definition: Establishing documented procedures for all development activities
  • Audits: Regularly reviewing processes to ensure compliance with established standards
  • Training: Educating team members on quality standards and procedures
  • Documentation: Maintaining comprehensive records of processes, procedures, and quality metrics
  • Review Meetings: Conducting periodic reviews to discuss quality issues and improvements

Traditional QA Approach

The traditional QA approach typically follows a waterfall model, where quality checks happen at specific stages of the development process. QA teams often function as separate entities from development teams, creating a clear distinction between those who build the product and those who test it.

In this model, QA activities usually begin after the development phase is complete, leading to a sequential workflow:

  1. Requirements gathering
  2. Design
  3. Development
  4. Testing (QA phase)
  5. Deployment
  6. Maintenance

Examples of QA Practices

Let’s explore some common QA practices with simple examples:

Test Case Documentation: QA teams create detailed test cases that specify exactly how to test a feature. For instance, when testing a login feature, a QA document might include:

Test Case ID: TC_LOGIN_001
Test Description: Verify successful login with valid credentials
Prerequisites: User account exists with username "testuser" and password "Password123"

Test Steps:
1. Navigate to login page
2. Enter "testuser" in username field
3. Enter "Password123" in password field
4. Click "Login" button

Expected Result: User is redirected to dashboard

Checklists: QA teams use checklists to ensure all aspects of a feature are tested. For a new e-commerce feature, a checklist might include:

  • Verify product images display correctly
  • Confirm price calculations are accurate
  • Test checkout process with different payment methods
  • Validate error messages for invalid inputs
  • Check responsive design on various devices

Understanding Quality Engineering (QE)

What is Quality Engineering?

Quality Engineering (QE) represents a more modern, holistic approach to ensuring software quality. Unlike QA, which focuses on process compliance, QE integrates quality practices throughout the entire development lifecycle, emphasizing continuous improvement and proactive quality measures.

QE is product-oriented and views quality as a shared responsibility across the entire team. It combines engineering principles with quality practices to build quality into the product from the beginning, rather than testing for quality at the end.

Key Activities in QE

QE encompasses a broader range of activities that integrate quality throughout the development process:

  • Test Automation: Developing automated test suites that can run continuously
  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): Implementing pipelines that automatically test and deploy code changes
  • Performance Engineering: Ensuring the application performs well under various conditions
  • Security Testing: Identifying and addressing security vulnerabilities
  • Shift-Left Testing: Moving testing activities earlier in the development cycle
  • Monitoring and Observability: Implementing tools to monitor application performance in production

Modern QE Approach

The modern QE approach aligns with Agile and DevOps methodologies, where quality is everyone’s responsibility. QE engineers work closely with developers, operations teams, and other stakeholders to build quality into every aspect of the software development process.

In this model, quality activities happen continuously throughout the development cycle:

  1. Continuous planning and requirements refinement
  2. Continuous design and development
  3. Continuous testing and integration
  4. Continuous deployment and delivery
  5. Continuous monitoring and feedback

Examples of QE Practices

Let’s explore some common QE practices with simple examples:

Test Automation Framework: QE engineers develop automated test suites that can run continuously. For example, using a framework like Selenium with Python:

from selenium import webdriver
from selenium.webdriver.common.by import By
from selenium.webdriver.common.keys import Keys

def test_login():
    driver = webdriver.Chrome()
    driver.get("https://example.com/login")

    # Find username and password fields and enter credentials
    username = driver.find_element(By.ID, "username")
    password = driver.find_element(By.ID, "password")

    username.send_keys("testuser")
    password.send_keys("Password123")

    # Click login button
    login_button = driver.find_element(By.ID, "login-btn")
    login_button.click()

    # Verify successful login by checking the URL
    assert "dashboard" in driver.current_url
    driver.quit()

Performance Testing: QE engineers implement performance tests to ensure the application performs well under load. For example, using a tool like JMeter to simulate multiple users:

<!-- JMeter Test Plan for Load Testing -->
<TestPlan guiclass="TestPlanGui" testclass="TestPlan" testname="Load Test for API">
  <elementProp name="TestPlan.arguments" elementType="Arguments">
    <collectionProp name="Arguments.arguments"/>
  </elementProp>
  <stringProp name="TestPlan.user_define_classpath"></stringProp>
  <boolProp name="TestPlan.functional_mode">false</boolProp>
  <boolProp name="TestPlan.serialize_threadgroups">false</boolProp>
</TestPlan>

Key Differences ( QA vs QE)

Philosophical Differences

The fundamental differences between QA and QE stem from their underlying philosophies:

AspectQuality Assurance (QA)Quality Engineering (QE)
FocusProcess complianceProduct quality
ApproachReactiveProactive
TimelineEnd of development cycleThroughout development cycle
ResponsibilityDedicated QA teamEntire development team
GoalPrevent defects through processBuild quality into the product

Process Differences

QA and QE follow different processes to achieve quality:

QA Process:

  • Defines standards and procedures upfront
  • Conducts reviews and audits to ensure compliance
  • Tests the product after development is complete
  • Reports defects and tracks their resolution
  • Focuses on documentation and process adherence

QE Process:

  • Integrates quality practices throughout development
  • Develops automated test suites for continuous testing
  • Collaborates with developers to implement quality gates
  • Monitors application performance in production
  • Focuses on continuous improvement and feedback loops

Role Differences

The roles and responsibilities of QA professionals and QE engineers differ significantly:

QA Professional:

  • Creates test plans and test cases
  • Executes manual and automated tests
  • Reports and tracks defects
  • Conducts process audits
  • Ensures compliance with quality standards

QE Engineer:

  • Develops automated test frameworks
  • Implements CI/CD pipelines with quality gates
  • Designs performance and security tests
  • Collaborates with developers on testable code
  • Monitors production systems for quality issues

Timeline Differences

The timing of quality activities differs between QA and QE:

QA Timeline:
Requirements -> Design -> Development -> [Testing] -> Deployment -> Maintenance

QE Timeline:
[Continuous Quality Activities Throughout All Phases]

In the QA approach, testing typically happens after development is complete, while in the QE approach, quality activities are integrated throughout the entire development lifecycle.

Evolution from QA to QE

Historical Context

The software industry has witnessed a significant evolution in quality practices over the past few decades. In the early days of software development, quality was often an afterthought, with testing happening just before release. As software systems grew more complex, the need for structured quality practices became apparent, leading to the emergence of formal QA processes.

The traditional QA approach served its purpose in the waterfall development model, where requirements were fixed upfront, and development followed a sequential path. However, as the industry shifted toward more agile methodologies, the limitations of the traditional QA approach became evident.

Why the Shift Occurred

Several factors contributed to the shift from QA to QE:

  1. Agile Methodologies: The adoption of Agile practices required a more integrated approach to quality, as development cycles became shorter and more iterative.
  2. DevOps Movement: The DevOps philosophy emphasized collaboration between development and operations teams, extending to quality practices as well.
  3. Continuous Delivery: The need to release software more frequently necessitated automated and continuous quality checks.
  4. Complexity of Modern Systems: Modern software systems are more complex, requiring more sophisticated quality practices beyond traditional testing.
  5. Customer Expectations: Today’s customers expect high-quality software with frequent updates, raising the bar for quality practices.

Benefits of the Transition

Organizations that have transitioned from QA to QE have reported several benefits:

  • Faster Time to Market: Continuous testing and integration enable faster releases
  • Improved Quality: Early detection of defects leads to higher-quality products
  • Better Resource Utilization: Automation reduces the need for repetitive manual testing
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Shared responsibility for quality improves team dynamics
  • Greater Flexibility: QE practices adapt more easily to changing requirements

Roles and Responsibilities

QA Roles

Traditional QA teams typically include several specialized roles:

QA Manager:

  • Oversees the entire QA process
  • Defines quality standards and procedures
  • Manages QA resources and budget
  • Reports on quality metrics to stakeholders

QA Analyst:

  • Creates test plans and test cases
  • Executes manual tests
  • Reports and tracks defects
  • Conducts regression testing

Test Automation Engineer:

  • Develops automated test scripts
  • Maintains test automation frameworks
  • Integrates automated tests into the build process

QE Roles

QE teams often have roles that blend technical expertise with quality knowledge:

Quality Engineering Lead:

  • Defines the QE strategy and approach
  • Oversees the implementation of quality practices
  • Guides the team in adopting new tools and technologies
  • Collaborates with other team leads to ensure quality

QE Engineer:

  • Develops automated test suites
  • Implements CI/CD pipelines with quality gates
  • Conducts performance and security testing
  • Collaborates with developers on testable code design

Performance Engineer:

  • Designs and executes performance tests
  • Analyzes performance metrics and identifies bottlenecks
  • Works with developers to optimize application performance

Overlapping Responsibilities

Despite their differences, QA and QE share some common responsibilities:

  • Defect Reporting: Both QA and QE professionals identify and report defects
  • Test Planning: Both roles involve planning testing activities
  • Quality Metrics: Both track and report on quality metrics
  • Continuous Improvement: Both aim to improve quality processes over time

Tools and Technologies

QA Tools

Traditional QA teams often use these tools:

Tool TypeExamplesPurpose
Test ManagementTestRail, Zephyr, Quality CenterTest case management and defect tracking
Manual TestingBrowserStack, Sauce LabsCross-browser and cross-device testing
Requirements ManagementJama, ReQtestRequirements traceability
Defect TrackingJira, BugzillaDefect reporting and tracking

QE Tools

QE teams typically leverage a broader set of tools:

Tool TypeExamplesPurpose
Test AutomationSelenium, Cypress, AppiumAutomated functional testing
CI/CDJenkins, GitLab CI, CircleCIContinuous integration and deployment
Performance TestingJMeter, Gatling, LoadRunnerLoad and stress testing
Security TestingOWASP ZAP, Burp SuiteSecurity vulnerability scanning
MonitoringPrometheus, Grafana, New RelicApplication monitoring and alerting

Shared Tools

Some tools are used by both QA and QE teams:

  • Version Control Systems: Git, SVN for managing test code and artifacts
  • Communication Tools: Slack, Microsoft Teams for team collaboration
  • Documentation Tools: Confluence, Notion for documenting processes and procedures

Implementing QE in Organizations

Steps to Transition from QA to QE

Organizations looking to transition from QA to QE can follow these steps:

  1. Assess Current State: Evaluate existing QA processes and identify areas for improvement
  2. Define QE Strategy: Establish a clear vision for quality engineering in your organization
  3. Invest in Automation: Build or acquire test automation frameworks and tools
  4. Upskill the Team: Provide training to help QA professionals acquire QE skills
  5. Implement CI/CD: Set up continuous integration and deployment pipelines
  6. Integrate Quality Gates: Define quality criteria that must be met before code progresses
  7. Monitor and Measure: Establish metrics to track the effectiveness of QE practices
  8. Iterate and Improve: Continuously refine QE processes based on feedback and results

Challenges and Solutions

Transitioning from QA to QE comes with its challenges:

Challenge 1: Cultural Resistance

  • Problem: Team members may resist changes to established processes
  • Solution: Communicate the benefits of QE clearly and involve the team in the transition process

Challenge 2: Skill Gaps

  • Problem: Existing QA professionals may lack the technical skills for QE
  • Solution: Invest in training and consider hiring new talent with QE expertise

Challenge 3: Tooling and Infrastructure

  • Problem: Existing tools and infrastructure may not support QE practices
  • Solution: Gradually introduce new tools and build the necessary infrastructure

Challenge 4: Measuring Success

  • Problem: It can be difficult to measure the ROI of QE practices
  • Solution: Establish clear metrics that demonstrate the value of QE, such as reduced defect rates and faster release cycles

Best Practices

Organizations implementing QE should consider these best practices:

  • Start Small: Begin with pilot projects to demonstrate the value of QE before scaling
  • Automate Strategically: Focus automation efforts on high-value, repetitive tests
  • Collaborate Across Teams: Foster collaboration between development, operations, and quality teams
  • Prioritize Test Cases: Use risk-based approaches to prioritize testing efforts
  • Maintain Test Suites: Regularly review and maintain automated test suites to ensure they remain relevant
  • Monitor in Production: Implement monitoring and observability to catch issues in production
  • Continuous Learning: Encourage continuous learning and improvement within the QE team

Future of Quality in Software Development

The field of quality engineering continues to evolve with several emerging trends:

Shift-Left Testing: Moving testing activities even earlier in the development cycle, sometimes to the requirements and design phases.

AI in Testing: Leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance testing capabilities, such as:

  • Intelligent test case generation
  • Predictive defect analysis
  • Visual testing automation
  • Test optimization and maintenance

Quality Observability: Extending monitoring capabilities to provide deeper insights into application quality in production.

Contract Testing: Implementing tests that verify the interactions between microservices, ensuring that changes to one service don’t break others.

AI and Machine Learning in Quality

AI and machine learning are transforming quality practices in several ways:

Intelligent Test Automation: AI-powered tools can automatically generate test cases based on application behavior, reducing the manual effort required for test creation.

Predictive Analytics: Machine learning models can analyze historical data to predict which parts of the code are most likely to contain defects, allowing teams to focus their testing efforts more effectively.

Visual Testing: AI can compare application screenshots to identify visual differences that might indicate defects, making it easier to test user interfaces.

Test Optimization: Machine learning algorithms can analyze test results to identify redundant tests and suggest optimizations to test suites.

Continuous Quality Engineering

The future of quality in software development lies in Continuous Quality Engineering, an approach that integrates quality practices seamlessly into the entire development lifecycle. This approach emphasizes:

  • Continuous Testing: Automated tests run continuously as part of the development process
  • Continuous Monitoring: Applications are monitored in production to detect quality issues in real-time
  • Continuous Feedback: Feedback loops ensure that quality insights inform future development
  • Continuous Improvement: Quality processes are continuously refined based on data and feedback

WrapUP

Quality Assurance and Quality Engineering represent two different approaches to ensuring software quality. While QA focuses on process compliance and testing at the end of the development cycle, QE integrates quality practices throughout the entire development process, emphasizing automation, continuous testing, and collaboration.

The shift from QA to QE reflects the broader evolution of software development from waterfall methodologies to Agile and DevOps practices. As organizations strive to deliver high-quality software at an ever-increasing pace, QE provides the framework and practices needed to meet these demands.

Implementing QE requires not just new tools and processes, but also a cultural shift that embraces quality as a shared responsibility. By investing in automation, upskilling teams, and fostering collaboration, organizations can successfully transition from QA to QE and reap the benefits of faster releases, higher quality, and better customer satisfaction.

FAQs

What’s the simplest way to think about the difference between QA and QE?

Think of it like building a house. Quality Assurance (QA )is like the final building inspector who comes at the end with a checklist to make sure the house was built according to the code. Quality Engineering (QE) is like the architect and engineer who designed the house with high-quality materials and a solid foundation from the very beginning to prevent problems from ever happening.

Is Quality Engineering just a new, fancy name for Quality Assurance?

No, they are genuinely different approaches. QA is a more traditional, process-focused discipline that primarily involves testing a product after it’s built. QE is a modern, engineering-focused approach that integrates quality practices throughout the entire development process, from the first line of code to deployment and monitoring. It’s an evolution, not just a rebranding.

Which one is better, QA or QE?

Neither is inherently “better”; they just fit different contexts. QE is better suited for modern, fast-paced development environments (like Agile and DevOps) where companies need to release software updates frequently. A can still be effective for projects with very long, fixed development cycles and where requirements are not expected to change much. The best choice depends on your team’s goals and workflow.

Does QE mean that manual testing is completely gone?

Not at all! While QE heavily relies on automation to handle repetitive tasks, manual testing is still very important. Human testers are essential for exploring the user experience, checking if the software feels intuitive, and finding bugs that automated scripts might miss. QE simply frees up manual testers from boring, repetitive checks so they can focus on more creative and complex testing.

Who is responsible for finding bugs in a QE environment?

In a QE environment, everyone shares responsibility for quality. It’s not just one team’s job. Developers write tests for their own code, QE engineers build automated test suites, and product managers help define clear requirements. The goal is to catch bugs as early as possible, not just at the end of the process.

What does “Shift-Left” testing actually mean?

“Shift-Left” is a key idea in QE. Imagine a timeline of your project, with the start (ideas) on the left and the finish (release) on the right. “Shift-Left” simply means moving testing activities to the left—or earlier—in that timeline. Instead of waiting for the finished product, you test requirements, designs, and small pieces of code as they are being created.

How does automation fit into the QA vs. QE picture?

Automation is a tool used in both, but its role is very different. In traditional QA, automation is often used for specific tasks like regression testing. In QE, automation is the backbone of the entire quality strategy. It’s used for continuous testing, providing instant feedback to developers, and making sure every change is safe to deploy.

Is the traditional QA role disappearing?

The role is evolving, not disappearing. The demand for people who only do manual, repetitive testing is decreasing. However, the need for quality professionals who have technical skills—like writing automation scripts, understanding CI/CD pipelines, and analyzing performance data—is growing rapidly. Many QA professionals are upskilling to become QE engineers.

Can a small company with a limited budget implement QE?

Yes, absolutely. Implementing QE is more about a change in mindset than buying expensive tools. A small team can start by:
Encouraging developers to write basic unit tests.
Automating one or two critical test cases.
Holding regular discussions about quality. The goal is to start small and build a culture of quality, then add more tools and processes as the team grows.

What’s the main goal of a QA team versus a QE team?

The main goal of a QA team is to ensure the final product meets the documented requirements and standards. They are the gatekeepers of quality at the end of the process. The main goal of a QE team is to build a system and culture that consistently produces high-quality products throughout the entire process. They are enablers of quality from start to finish.

Nishant G.

Nishant G.

Systems Engineer
Active since Apr 2024
237 Posts

A systems engineer focused on optimizing performance and maintaining reliable infrastructure. Specializes in solving complex technical challenges, implementing automation to improve efficiency, and building secure, scalable systems that support smooth and consistent operations.

You May Also Like

More From Author

4 2 votes
Would You Like to Rate US
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments